DC KinCare Alliance and George Washington University Law School Public Justice Advocacy Clinic file litigation against MPD for violating DC FOIA requirements by failing to provide requested documents related to its decisions not to prosecute cases involving child physical and sexual abuse, child trafficking, and child fatalities.  

Foster Kinship contends that CFSA discriminates when it diverts children and refuses to license their kin caregivers as foster parents, which results in various harms, including being denied access to the benefits, support, and protections given to foster parents.

The Alliance for Children’s Rights files a Brief for Amicus Curiae contending DC’s diversion practice fails to safeguard the safety and wellbeing of abused and neglected children.

DC Volunteer Lawyers Project files Amicus Curiae Brief contending DC’s diversion practices are illegal.

Judge Hogan orders six federal cases consolidated. The March 2021 cases are stayed pending rulings on the Motions to Dismiss in the KS and SK cases. Oral argument on the MTD is scheduled for July 28, 2021 at 11:00 am.  Members of the public may listen on: 1-877-402-9753, Code: 6258087#.

DC KinCare Alliance and the law firm of Ropes & Gray LLP file four additional federal lawsuits on behalf of nine plaintiffs.  In total, DC KinCare Alliance and Ropes & Gray have filed six lawsuits on behalf of 20 plaintiffs challenging CFSA’s illegal practice of hidden foster care, also known as kinship diversion.

DC responds to Plaintiffs’ opposition to the District of Columbia’s (the District) motion to dismiss in S.K. v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 20-753 (TFH).

Plaintiffs C.G.1, C.G.2, C.G.3, N.G. and S.K. respectfully submit this memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the District of Columbia (“DC”) and the DC Child and Family Services Agency’s (“CFSA”), (collectively, the “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be denied.

Defendants the District of Columbia and Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) (collectively, the District) move to dismiss plaintiffs’ Complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

DC responds to Plaintiffs’ opposition to the District of Columbia’s (the District) motion to dismiss in K.H. v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 19-3124 (TFH).

DC KinCare Alliance and the law firm of Ropes & Gray LLP file second federal lawsuit on behalf of five plaintiffs challenging the DC Child and Family Services Agency’s ongoing, illegal practice of “Kinship Diversion.”

Plaintiffs K.H., K.J., M.M., L.E., L.C., and T.C. respectfully submit this memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the District of Columbia (“DC”) and the DC Child and Family Services Agency’s (“CFSA”), (collectively, the “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be denied.

Defendants the District of Columbia and Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) (collectively, the District) move to dismiss plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

DC KinCare Alliance and the law firm Ropes & Gray LLP file a federal lawsuit against the District of Columbia and the DC Child and Family Services Agency for violating the rights of six plaintiffs under DC and federal laws.